Another Highlight

News Search of the Week

Here's what the media are saying about:

President Obama's College Affordability/ Accountability Proposals

. . . or visit either our short list of hot topics or our full search-by-topic list to browse news and commentary on any of 100+ higher ed topics.

Another Highlight

User Login

Forgot Password?

Not a user? [Sign Up]

Busting the Myths about Private Colleges

NAICU debunks the major myths surrounding private nonprofit colleges and universities. Visit to get the facts!

Read More

Private Colleges Focus on Affordability

New campus affordability measures are helping to keep students' and families' out-of-pocket costs as low as possible. Tuition cuts and freezes, three-year degree programs, and more. Complete list



Additional Accreditation Reforms Offered by Education Department

NAICU Washington Update

February 11, 2016

In early February, the Department of Education publicly released a series of reforms aimed at further strengthening the accreditation process. The changes build off the previously outlined mandates released in November 2015.  

The new requirements—released via memo from Acting Education Secretary John King, Jr. — outline three specific recommendations designed for “shared action to improve accreditation”: 

  1. Information-Sharing and Coordination: The Department and the accreditors have drafted an information-sharing framework and agreed to jointly develop plans for regular meetings and information-sharing, including information regarding schools that may be facing negative actions.
  2. Flexibility and Differentiated Reviews: The Department will release further guidance within 120 days to clarify acceptable practices for differentiated accreditation review. The Department will encourage accreditors on specific criteria, such as historical record and outcomes, when applying differentiated flexibility to institutions.
  3. Additional Actions to Increase Accreditor Rigor: The Department will release further guidance within 120 days to increase the rigor of the Department’s processes to determine whether an accrediting agency is “effective.”
Since two of the recommendations involve further guidance from the Department, it is difficult to gauge the immediate impact of these reforms. 

Regarding the Department’s plans to increase accreditor rigor for executive recognition, it is unclear whether these changes would be enacted via changes to the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) or through secretarial power. NACIQI was created by Congress in 1992 explicitly to advise the Secretary on accreditor recognition. However, final say over accreditor recognition by the federal government lies solely with the Secretary.  

Add to Digg! Add to Delicious Add to Facebook Add to LinkedIn  Add to StumbleUpon Add to Twitter RSS