About | Washington Update | Sign Up for Headline News
|
View by Type
|
Browse News By Type
Patricia McGuire, president, Trinity Washington University, writes: According to the federal formula for calculating college graduation rates, close to a majority of all college students are dropouts or lost to the system entirely, even if they have earned degrees. For Trinity and many similar universities enrolling large numbers of students who transfer in, or who are part-time students, or who are "non-traditional" by many other factors, a majority of the degrees awarded go to students who don't count in the federal data system. The collegiate graduation rate may well be the most poorly constructed and misunderstood statistic in all of higher education.
Kenneth P. Ruscio, President, Washington and Lee University, writes: Sadly, almost any topic in our modern society becomes politicized, forcing us into a corner where we must choose to be for or against. Opinion comes first, interpretation comes later, if at all. Simplicity is the order of the day. Dealing with complexity is inconvenient. So it is with the irresistible urge to judge historical figures such as Thomas Jefferson, Robert E. Lee and even George Washington - deciding whether we are pro or con, and then injecting them into our contemporary partisan conflicts.
James M. Danko, president, Butler University, writes: Like the auto and newspaper industries, American higher education needs to innovate and reinvent itself if it's going to survive, thrive, and recapture its earlier glory. Industries I would argue that we're already in the midst of a changing higher education model. My colleagues across the country and I are working to ensure that college is affordable and accessible. And we are looking carefully at our curricular and extracurricular programs to determine if the status quo truly meets the needs of our students.
Thomas A. Kazee, president, University of Evansville, writes: We often fail to share what could be one of the most important contributions to the life of the community: the remarkable collective intellectual capital of our faculties. The aggregate intellectual capital represented by a faculty at an American college, even a small one, is vast: Economists, biologists, philosophers, engineers, and historians are teaching and researching the most pressing issues of the day. Yet in my experience, we too seldom take advantage of this resource in an intentional and systematic way.
Jeff Abernathy, president, Alma College, writes: For all of our talk about the college’s carbon footprint, we at Alma have lately been discussing the many ways in which even a small college impacts the local community and environment. Some of the most exciting work I have done 18 months into my work at Alma College has been in collaboration with our local communities. I am still learning about the exciting work of building and nurturing community partnerships which will be key to the college's future as well as that of our town and region.
Lee C. Bollinger, president, Columbia University, writes: There have been few moments in our history when the nation so badly needed institutions to unify the country, overcome divisiveness, and dispel the unfounded "jealousies and prejudices" that our first president warned against. Yet if the Supreme Court decides to hear a case called Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin , colleges could be severely restricted in continuing to serve this unifying function.
Catharine Hill, president, Vassar College, writes: As the U.S. military presence in Iraq draws to a close, it's time for colleges and universities to increase their commitment to veterans who want more education. Selective private colleges in particular must step up and do our part. With more than two million veterans currently eligible for GI Bill tuition benefits, and even more expected to be added to this number over the coming years, there must be plenty of veterans for whom our institutions would indeed be a good option.
Frederick G. Slabach, president, Texas Wesleyan University, writes: There is a consensus that the best way for undergraduate students to learn to think and reason is through frequent written and oral communication assignments accompanied by significant faculty feedback. Once upon a time in America, all college students received this kind of education. But no longer. Lectures are adequate for transferring information from one person to another, but they are inadequate, on their own, to help students develop higher-order thinking skills.
Jay Lemons, president, Susquehanna University, writes: Fundamentally, in an era of austerity, I struggle with the question of how we can justify federal tax dollars supporting for-profit institutions when there is not adequate support for the not-for-profit sector that has served our nation very well throughout its history. Why should scarce federal tax dollars in the form of PELL grants go to the pockets of shareholders of companies when there are incredible needs in the not-for-profit sector?
Christopher Nelson, president, St. John's College in Annapolis, writes: Students headed for college are worried that they may not find employment when they graduate. Specialized career training at the undergraduate level might thus seem to have appeal. And yet, study after study suggests that the best preparation for the workforce of tomorrow, for the jobs that have yet to be created, is a liberal education -- the kind of education most especially found at the small residential liberal arts colleges across the country.
| Next | Total Records: 286 |
© 2012 National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. All Rights Reserved.
1025 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 785-8866, Fax - (202) 835-0003
Questions or comments? Contact webmaster@naicu.edu.
Privacy Policy Terms of Use