Letters & Op-Eds

  • refine by:
X

NAICU Letter to the Chronicle of Higher Education

NAICU Letter to the Chronicle of Higher Education

March 23, 2009

Letters to the Editor
Chronicle of Higher Education

To the Editor:

Diane Auer Jones is a fair and independent thinker, and a friend of all sectors of higher education.  However, on the issue of a federal student unit record database, she does not fully understand the policy concerns of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (“Washington Has Failed the Workhorses of American Higher Education,” commentary, March 27).

There is a legitimate privacy question here, and to dismiss NAICU’s motives as being otherwise diminishes the very real changes in privacy policy that have emerged as these databases are built throughout the nation. 

Many of the students at private colleges and universities are nontraditional: 29 percent work full-time; 77 percent work part-time; 26 percent attend part-time; 30 percent are age 25 or older; and 48 percent are first-generation.  At-risk students are much more likely to graduate in four years at a private college than at a public university.  We are confident that under a federal student unit record database, our institutions’ completion rates would be similarly higher. 

However, this is a fundamental privacy question that focuses on who controls access to personal academic and financial data: students and their families, or state and federal governments.  NAICU's position has been to stand by the principles set down by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).  Adult students and parents of minor students are the ones who retain first control over personally identifiable academic and financial records. 

Under FERPA, individual students must be informed of the government’s intent, give consent, and have the right to opt out of any use of personal academic or financial records outside of their college or university.  Proponents of the federal student unit record database have told us that applying the FERPA guidelines would be “too hard” and that too many families would not give consent. 

NAICU has never objected to tracking federal aid recipients, since they voluntarily fill out the FAFSA, and turn over their confidential information as a part of the application process.  Student unit record systems currently under development track all students, even those not receiving federal aid, and neither inform families nor give them an opt-out option.

NAICU agrees with Ms. Jones that better completion data is needed.  In December 2002, prior to Margaret Spellings talking the helm at the Education Department, and before the idea of a federal student database had gathered steam, NAICU submitted a proposal asking for the department to improve its student aid tracking system for graduation rate purposes. 

We also agree that community colleges, with their focus on universal access and affordability, are a vital component of U.S. higher education.  However, sacrificing student and family privacy rights for an all-encompassing federal tracking system is a policy trade off we don’t believe is in the best interest of students, their families, or the nation. 

Sincerely,

David L. Warren
President
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
Washington, D.C.

Letters to the Editor
Chronicle of Higher Education

To the Editor:

Diane Auer Jones is a fair and independent thinker, and a friend of all sectors of higher education.  However, on the issue of a federal student unit record database, she does not fully understand the policy concerns of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (“Washington Has Failed the Workhorses of American Higher Education,” commentary, March 27).

There is a legitimate privacy question here, and to dismiss NAICU’s motives as being otherwise diminishes the very real changes in privacy policy that have emerged as these databases are built throughout the nation. 

Many of the students at private colleges and universities are nontraditional: 29 percent work full-time; 77 percent work part-time; 26 percent attend part-time; 30 percent are age 25 or older; and 48 percent are first-generation.  At-risk students are much more likely to graduate in four years at a private college than at a public university.  We are confident that under a federal student unit record database, our institutions’ completion rates would be similarly higher. 

However, this is a fundamental privacy question that focuses on who controls access to personal academic and financial data: students and their families, or state and federal governments.  NAICU's position has been to stand by the principles set down by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).  Adult students and parents of minor students are the ones who retain first control over personally identifiable academic and financial records. 

Under FERPA, individual students must be informed of the government’s intent, give consent, and have the right to opt out of any use of personal academic or financial records outside of their college or university.  Proponents of the federal student unit record database have told us that applying the FERPA guidelines would be “too hard” and that too many families would not give consent. 

NAICU has never objected to tracking federal aid recipients, since they voluntarily fill out the FAFSA, and turn over their confidential information as a part of the application process.  Student unit record systems currently under development track all students, even those not receiving federal aid, and neither inform families nor give them an opt-out option.

NAICU agrees with Ms. Jones that better completion data is needed.  In December 2002, prior to Margaret Spellings talking the helm at the Education Department, and before the idea of a federal student database had gathered steam, NAICU submitted a proposal asking for the department to improve its student aid tracking system for graduation rate purposes. 

We also agree that community colleges, with their focus on universal access and affordability, are a vital component of U.S. higher education.  However, sacrificing student and family privacy rights for an all-encompassing federal tracking system is a policy trade off we don’t believe is in the best interest of students, their families, or the nation. 

Sincerely,

David L. Warren
President
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
Washington, D.C.

March 23, 2009

show article

read full article


X

NAICU Letter Printed in the Western Washington Front

NAICU Letter Printed in the Western Washington Front

July 28, 2008

Letters to the Editor
The Western Front

To the Editor:

Stephen Nichols offers the perfect prescription for making American higher education unaffordable and inaccessible — that is, by cutting federal student aid programs ("Government subsidizing hurts tuition," July 22). Every piece of existing empirical evidence refutes the claim that federal student aid feeds college tuition increases.

Two U.S. Department of Education studies have shown that there are "no associations between federal grants, state grants, and student loans, and changes in tuition," and "there is little evidence that federal student aid increases have contributed to tuition inflation."

The erosion of federal student aid this decade has become an additional strain on college budgets as institutions attempt to fill the gap. Congress has not kept funding for student aid in line with inflation, growing family need or the wave of low-income and first-generation college students who are academically prepared for college. Federal student aid has made college possible for students from all backgrounds for 40 years. Add a federal deinvestment in student aid to rising institutional cost pressures and growing student need, and you've created a recipe for financial disaster for students and their families.

Sincerely, 

Tony Pals
Director of Public Information
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
Washington, D.C.

Letters to the Editor
The Western Front

To the Editor:

Stephen Nichols offers the perfect prescription for making American higher education unaffordable and inaccessible — that is, by cutting federal student aid programs ("Government subsidizing hurts tuition," July 22). Every piece of existing empirical evidence refutes the claim that federal student aid feeds college tuition increases.

Two U.S. Department of Education studies have shown that there are "no associations between federal grants, state grants, and student loans, and changes in tuition," and "there is little evidence that federal student aid increases have contributed to tuition inflation."

The erosion of federal student aid this decade has become an additional strain on college budgets as institutions attempt to fill the gap. Congress has not kept funding for student aid in line with inflation, growing family need or the wave of low-income and first-generation college students who are academically prepared for college. Federal student aid has made college possible for students from all backgrounds for 40 years. Add a federal deinvestment in student aid to rising institutional cost pressures and growing student need, and you've created a recipe for financial disaster for students and their families.

Sincerely, 

Tony Pals
Director of Public Information
National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
Washington, D.C.

July 28, 2008

show article

read full article


X

College Loans Are Least of Government's Problems

College Loans Are Least of Government's Problems

April 30, 2008

The April 24 editorial "Bailout of the Year" ignores the free lunch opportunity of a federal intervention in the student-loan market.
The April 24 editorial "Bailout of the Year" ignores the free lunch opportunity of a federal intervention in the student-loan market.

April 30, 2008

show article

read full article


X

Our view on higher education: Leave endowments alone

Our view on higher education: Leave endowments alone

March 27, 2008

Best to hold onto some money for the even rainier days to come, and best for Congress to look elsewhere if it wants to help.
Best to hold onto some money for the even rainier days to come, and best for Congress to look elsewhere if it wants to help.

March 27, 2008

show article

read full article


X

Opposing view: Make rich colleges pay

Opposing view: Make rich colleges pay

March 27, 2008

Over a hundred colleges with big endowments are sitting on their money while families struggle. Those endowments enjoy billions in tax breaks that we all subsidize.
Over a hundred colleges with big endowments are sitting on their money while families struggle. Those endowments enjoy billions in tax breaks that we all subsidize.

March 27, 2008

show article

read full article


Displaying results 21-25 (of 71)
 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 

About the items posted on the NAICU site: News items, features, and opinion pieces posted on this site from sources outside NAICU do not necessarily reflect the position of the association or its members. Rather, this content reflects the diversity of issues and views that are shaping American higher education.

Top